Looking resigned to the $85 billion in
"sequestration" cuts starting on Friday, government agencies began
reducing costs and spelling out to employees how furloughs will work.
Expectations were low that a White House
meeting on Friday between Obama and congressional leaders, including Republican
foes, would produce any deal to avoid the cuts.
Speaking to a business group, Obama said
the cuts could shave 0.6 percentage points or more from already anemic growth
and urged executives to pressure Congress into compromising on a broad deficit
reduction package.
"Whether that can be done in the next
two days - I haven't seen things done in two days in Washington in quite some
time," Obama told the Business Council, which is composed of chief
executives of major U.S. corporations. "The good news is that the public
is beginning to pay attention to this."
Public services across the country - from
air traffic control to food safety inspections and education - might be
disrupted if the cuts go ahead.
Put into law in 2011 as part of an earlier
fiscal crisis, sequestration is unloved by both parties because of the economic
pain it will cause, but the politicians cannot agree how to stop it.
A deal in Congress on less drastic spending
cuts, perhaps with tax increases too, is needed by Friday to halt the
sequestration reductions, which are split between social programs cherished by
Democrats and defense spending championed by Republicans.
Obama stuck by his demand that Republicans
accept tax increases in the form of eliminating tax loopholes enjoyed mostly by
the wealthy as part of a balanced approach to avoiding sequestration.
"There is no alternative in the
president's mind to balance," White House spokesman Jay Carney told
reporters.
Obama wants to end tax breaks for oil and
gas companies and the lower "carried interest" tax rate enjoyed by
hedge funds.
But Republicans who reluctantly agreed to
raise income tax rates on the rich to avert the "fiscal cliff" crisis
in December are in no mood for that.
"One thing Americans simply will not
accept is another tax increase to replace spending reductions we already agreed
to," said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.
In one of the first concrete effects of the
cuts, the administration took the unusual step of freeing several hundred
detained illegal immigrants because of the cost of holding them.
Republicans described that move by
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as a political stunt aimed at scaring
them into agreeing to end the sequestration on Obama's terms.
The issue looked like it might become more
controversial on Wednesday when the Associated Press reported that the Homeland
Security Department official in charge of immigration enforcement and removal
had announced his resignation on Tuesday just after news of the immigrants'
releases came out.
But ICE said the report was
"misleading." The official, Gary Mead, told ICE weeks ago of his
retirement in April after 40 years of federal service, a spokeswoman said.
Earlier, Carney denied the White House had ordered the immigrants' release.
Friday's White House meeting will include
McConnell and the other key congressional leaders: Senate Democratic leader
Harry Reid, House of Representatives Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, and House
Speaker John Boehner, the top U.S. Republican.
'BELATED FARCE'?
The chances of success were not high.
One congressional Republican aide
criticized the White House for calling the meeting for the day the cuts were
coming into effect. "Either someone needs to buy the White House a
calendar, or this is just a - belated - farce. They ought to at least pretend to
try."
Unlike during other fiscal fights in
Congress, the stock market is taking the sequestration impasse calmly.
U.S. stocks rose, with major indexes
posting their best daily gains since early January, as Federal Reserve Chairman
Ben Bernanke remained steadfast in supporting the Fed's stimulus policy and
data pointed to economic improvement.
On Thursday, the Senate is expected to vote
on competing Democratic and Republican ideas for replacing the sequestration.
Both measures are expected to be defeated.
The Republican plan unveiled late on
Wednesday would let the sequestration go into effect on Friday, but require
Obama to submit an alternative $85 billion spending reduction plan to Congress
by March 15, thus allowing more flexibility on how the cuts would be carried
out.
Congress would have until March 22 to
reject the proposal, in which case the original sequestration would remain in
place. Democrats were still studying it. But on Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid said new revenues needed to be part of any substitute plan.
The Democratic proposal would replace the
across-the-board cuts mainly with tax increases on the rich coupled with
spending cuts. Some of those would be achieved by eliminating crop subsidies
for large agricultural companies. More savings would be through minor defense
cuts in later years.
Republicans have vowed to block any tax
increases for deficit reduction.
Bernanke said sequestration was too drastic
an approach for reducing the budget deficit.
"What I am advising is a more gradual
approach. I'm not saying we should ignore the deficit. I am not saying we
shouldn't deal with long-term fiscal issues, but I think that from the
perspective of our recovery, a more gradual approach would be
constructive," he told a House Financial Services Committee hearing.
Among many warnings from the Obama
administration of possible damage to public services, the Air Force said its
Thunderbirds exhibition flying team is expected to be grounded if sequestration
happens.
The Pentagon will put most of its 800,000
civilian employees on unpaid leave for 22 days, slash ship and aircraft
maintenance and curtail training.
But the full weight of sequestration will
take place over seven months, allowing Obama and the Republicans time to work
out a deal after the cuts begin this week.
White House spokesman Carney said
sequestration would officially start just before midnight on Friday night if no
deal were reached.
Government agencies began to tell employees
how sequestration will force them to take furloughs. The Environmental
Protection Agency acting head, Bob Perciasepe, told employees in an email that
the agency did not know how much of its budget will be cut but it was working
on an estimate of 5 percent.
"What might that mean for our
employees? If the sequester order requires a 5.0% cut, the impact could be up
to 13 furlough days," he said. That would likely mean four furlough days
by June 1, he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment