The U.S.
economy is hurtling toward a recession if Congress fails to avert a series of
tax hikes and budget cuts due in January, the Congressional Budget Office said
Wednesday, warning that a fiscal impasse would have consequences even more dire
than previously forecast.
The CBO’s
gloom sparked another round of political finger-pointing but failed to cast
much of a shadow over financial markets. That’s because the Federal Reserve is
inclined to act “fairly soon” to boost the slow pace of economic recovery, according
to minutes the central bank released Wednesday. Moreover, new data showed signs
of modest improvement in the housing market.
All of
which raises a quandary for some economists: If Congress is about to steer the
nation over what is being widely dubbed a “fiscal cliff” by failing to agree on
a budget, then maybe the Fed should save its ammunition. Let things get really
bad, then act.
“Why do you want to waste your ammo now if you’re going to go off a
fiscal cliff at the beginning of next year?” said Edward Yardeni, president of
Yardeni Research, urging restraint by the Fed. By revving up the economy before
it reaches the cliff, Yardeni said, “maybe [the Fed] thinks we can do an Evel
Knievel and jump right over it. But I don’t get the logic of that.”
But the
Fed minutes indicated that most of the members of its Open Market Committee
think otherwise.
“Many members judged that additional monetary accommodation would likely
be warranted fairly soon unless incoming information pointed to a substantial
and sustainable strengthening in the pace of the economic recovery,” said the
minutes of the meeting held July 31 and Aug. 1.
The Fed
debated a variety of tools for boosting growth, including extending its current
commitment to ultra-low federal funds rates past 2014, linking those rates to
economic indicators, launching a new round of purchases of Treasury and
mortgage securities and initiating a scheme to encourage bank lending.
With just
21 / 2 months left until the presidential election, it may be too late for
monetary or fiscal policy to significantly alter the state of the economy
before voters head to the polls. But actions taken now by the Fed or Congress
might still influence whether voters believe the economy is on the right track.
A steep
cliff might not look like the right direction, though, and the CBO said
businesses might delay hiring or investment if the outlook is threatening.
In its
report Wednesday, the CBO warned that the nation would be plunged into a
significant recession during the first half of next year if Congress fails to
avert nearly $500 billion in tax hikes and spending cuts set to hit in January.
The
massive round of New Year’s belt-tightening — known as the “fiscal cliff” or
“Taxmageddon” — would disrupt recent economic progress, push the unemployment
rate back up to 9.1 percent by the end of 2013 and produce economic conditions
“that will probably be considered a recession,” the nonpartisan CBO said.
The CBO’s
economic outlook is considerably darker than the forecast the agency released
in January, when it predicted that the fiscal cliff would trigger a mild
recession in the first half of 2013, with the economy shrinking by 1.3 percent.
Now the agency foresees a stronger contraction of 2.9 percent in gross domestic
product, “similar in magnitude to the recession of the early 1990s.”
Republicans,
including presidential candidate Mitt Romney, want to postpone the biggest
chunk of the cliff — $331 billion in tax hikes — to give Congress time to
overhaul the tax code.
They have
also sought to pin the scheduled deep cut in military spending on President
Obama, working to undercut his support in electoral battlegrounds where defense
spending is key to the economy. The Republican-led House passed legislation in
the spring that would shift those defense cuts onto domestic programs.
Democrats,
including the president, want to avert tax hikes for those making less than
$250,000 a year but say they will not avert tax increases for those making
more, arguing that higher tax revenues are needed to help close deficits.
House
Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said the report underscores why the House in
August passed legislation to avoid tax increases for Americans at all income
levels. The Democratic-led Senate passed a competing bill to halt tax increases
only on income less than $250,000.
“Instead of threatening to drive us off the fiscal cliff and tank our
economy in their quest for higher taxes, I would urge President Obama and
congressional Democrats to work with us to stop the coming tax hike that
threatens our economy and replace the looming defense cuts with common sense
reforms,” Boehner said in a statement.
The White
House turned the tables, responding in a statement that the report “only
reinforces the urgent need for House Republicans to follow the Senate’s lead
and pass a bill that gives middle-class families the confidence that they won’t
see their taxes go up at the beginning of next year.”
The CBO
report is gloomier than the agency’s January forecast in part because of a
decision by Congress to steepen the fiscal cliff by extending a temporary
payroll tax break and emergency unemployment benefits, which are now also set
to expire in January.
In
addition, CBO analysts have concluded that the underlying economy is weaker
than previously predicted.
“The magnitude of the slowdown we’re discussing next year is
significant,” CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf said at a morning briefing. He
noted that going over the cliff could cost the nation about 2 million jobs.
Elmendorf said the unemployment rate could remain stuck above 8 percent through
2014.
The
agency says growth would be weaker than previously forecast, with the economy
expanding by an annualized rate of just 1.9 percent in the second half of 2013.
Even
without a year-end fiscal crisis, the Fed “anticipates a very gradual pickup in
economic activity over time and a slow decline in unemployment,” with low
inflation, according to the central bank’s minutes.
But the
Fed members confessed “an unusually high level of uncertainty” about the outlook,
noting that Europe’s sovereign-debt and banking crisis and the specter of “a
sharper-than-anticipated fiscal contraction in the United States” meant that
expectations were “tilted to the downside.”
Republicans
have been increasingly vocal about their desire to avert the $55 billion in
planned reductions at the Defense Department in January. In Tampa this week, a
drafting committee inserted language into the party’s official platform calling
the defense cut “a disaster for national security” and blaming Obama for its
creation.
The
platform does not address the equally stark $55 billion across-the-board cut
scheduled to hit domestic programs or offer guidance on how to avert the cuts
without worsening the deficits.
While the
CBO report outlines the consequences to the economy of failing to reach a deal
to avert the cuts and tax increases, it also demonstrates the flip side of
continued gridlock: one of the biggest rounds of deficit reduction in modern
history.
If
Congress does nothing and allows taxes to rise and spending to fall, the CBO
predicts the 2013 deficit would plummet to $641 billion instead of exceeding $1
trillion for a fifth straight year.
For the
current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30, the CBO predicts the deficit will be
just over $1.1 trillion, down slightly from previous projections, thanks to
better-than-expected tax collections and lower spending as the war in Iraq ends
and the effects of the 2009 economic stimulus wane.
The
national debt is nonetheless growing apace, with debt owed to outside investors
set to hit 73 percent of the overall economy by the end of September. That’s
the highest level in more than 60 years and nearly double the level in 2007,
before the onset of the recent recession.
No comments:
Post a Comment