Egypt's new president moved Sunday to
reconvene a parliament that was dissolved last month, according to Egyptian
state media, in what amounts to the president's most aggressive assault yet
against the lingering power of the former ruling military regime.
President Mohammed Morsi, a former leader
in the powerful Muslim Brotherhood, said that the parliament, which was elected
this past winter, would serve until new parliamentary elections, which are set
to be held 60 days after a constituent assembly finishes work on the country's
new constitution—a process that could take months.
The presidential decree effectively
attempts to snatch back legislative authority from military leaders who
dissolved parliament last month and claimed lawmaking privileges for themselves
in a constitutional declaration issued only two weeks ago. The military's decision
followed a verdict by the Supreme Constitutional Court, which decided on June
14 that parts of a law governing parliamentary elections were unconstitutional.
If the parliament does indeed reconvene, it will meet on Tuesday for the first
time in nearly one month.
Yet it was unclear on Sunday evening
whether the military would yield to Mr. Morsi's decision or lead Egypt's
nascent civilian-led democracy into a full-blown constitutional crisis. Even
after the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, or SCAF, handed executive power
to the country's first ever freely elected president in a ceremony late last
month, the ill-defined political system the military left behind has allowed
competing political forces to write and rewrite the rules of the game.
The lingering legal confusion exposes the
faulty foundation on which the military leadership built Egypt's new democracy.
Returning parliamentarians to their seats
is the latest broadside in a continuing tit-for-tat power struggle between the
Muslim Brotherhood on one side and the military and the judiciary on the other.
In the past several months, both sides have
used the arcane legal maneuvers and street protests in a bitter struggle for
political power.
Adding to the uncertainty, Egypt's Supreme
Administrative Court is set to rule on Monday on the legality of the SCAF's
decision to disband parliament. Like the Supreme Constitutional Court that
dissolved parliament last month, judges on the administrative court are known
to have loyalties to Egypt's ousted regime.
"What happens if the Supreme
Administrative Court decides that the military is the executive authority and
they had the right to do this?" said Michael Hanna, an Egypt expert and
fellow at the New York based Century Foundation. "This has the makings of
a real constitutional crisis."
Mr. Morsi's move appeared to catch both the
SCAF and Egypt's high court by surprise. The generals held an emergency meeting
to discuss the announcement on Sunday evening and the Supreme Constitutional
Court said it would hold an emergency meeting on Monday, according to the state
news agency.
Shortly after Mr. Morsi's decision was
announced, Brotherhood leaders rushed to portray the decree as an unassailable
presidential prerogative.
Despite that the Supreme Constitutional
Court's June 14 ruling, it was the military that made the politicized decision
to sack a parliament that was crowded with Islamist politicians, particularly
from the Muslim Brotherhood, said Rashad Al Bayoumi, a Brotherhood leader and
close confidant of Mr. Morsi.
Egyptian courts had dissolved parliament
twice under the regime of ousted President Hosni Mubarak, but each required
public approval in a nationwide referendum. When the military dissolved
parliament last month, they did it without a referendum, noted Assam Abdel
Gabar, an Egyptian judge.
As the new executive, Mr. Morsi has the
power to reinstate parliament wielding the same legal weapons the SCAF first
used to dissolve it, said Mr. Gabar.
And by pledging to hold new parliamentary
elections—presumably under new rules consistent with the constitution—Mr. Morsi
has actually reinforced the high court's decision, Brotherhood leaders said.
"During these critical times, it's
normal that a country will need authority for making laws," Mr. Bayoumi
said. "This is normal for a president to determine the different
authorities of the state."
Yet even if the courts rule the military
did exceed its bounds, the ruling officers issued a constitutional declaration
shortly before leaving office that endowed them with legislative powers until
the election of a new parliament.
Determining whether such a constitutional
declaration lies beyond the remit of Egypt's presidency could create yet
another destabilizing point of contention.
No comments:
Post a Comment